Fairness-Constrained Curriculum Adaptation for AI-Enhanced Education: A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework with NLP-Driven Cultural Analysis

Authors

  • Yiming Wang Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/vw2bg038

Keywords:

Fairness-Constrained Curriculum Adaptation, Multi-Objective Optimization, NLP-Driven Cultural Analysis, Transformer-based Model

Abstract

We propose a fairness-constrained curriculum adaptation framework for AI-enhanced education that integrates natural language processing (NLP) with multi-objective optimization to dynamically tailor learning materials while ensuring cultural responsiveness and ethical alignment. The proposed method employs a Transformer-based language model to analyze student-generated text, extracting latent cultural and demographic features, which are then clustered using a fairness-sensitive algorithm to mitigate biased representations. These features are combined with conventional performance metrics to formulate a multi-objective optimization problem that simultaneously maximizes pedagogical effectiveness and minimizes disparities across demographic groups. The optimization framework incorporates differentiable fairness constraints, such as equalized odds, to ensure equitable learning outcomes while adhering to institutional guidelines. Moreover, the system interfaces with existing educational platforms through input and output substitution mechanisms, enabling seamless integration with conventional modules. A key novelty lies in the coupling of NLP-driven cultural analysis with constrained optimization, which provides a transparent and auditable approach to curriculum adaptation. Furthermore, the framework includes a human-in-the-loop component, allowing educators to override recommendations and refine the system iteratively. Experimental validation demonstrates that the method achieves superior fairness-performance trade-offs compared to baseline approaches, offering a scalable solution for equitable education. The work contributes to the growing discourse on ethical AI in education by addressing both technical and societal challenges through a mathematically rigorous yet interpretable framework.

References

[1]L Chen, P Chen & Z Lin (2020) Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access.

[2]S Bird, K Kenthapadi, E Kiciman, et al. (2019) Fairness-aware machine learning: Practical challenges and lessons learned. In ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.

[3]T Kabudi, I Pappas & DH Olsen (2021) AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

[4]W Zhang (2024) AI fairness in practice: Paradigm, challenges, and prospects. Ai Magazine.

[5]B Greer, S Mukhopadhyay, AB Powell, et al. (2009) Culturally responsive mathematics education. api.taylorfrancis.com.

[6]O Loukas & HR Chung (2023) Demographic parity: Mitigating biases in real-world data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17347.

[7]KR Chowdhary & KR Chowdhary (2020) Natural language processing. Fundamentals of artificial intelligence.

[8]Y Bengio (2000) Gradient-based optimization of hyperparameters. Neural computation.

[9]YZ Liew, AHP Tan, EH Yap, CS Lim, APPA Majeed, et al. (2024) Systems Thinking on Artificial Intelligence Integration into Higher Education: Causal Loops. intechopen.com.

[10]MC Urdaneta-Ponte, A Mendez-Zorrilla, et al. (2021) Recommendation systems for education: Systematic review. Electronics.

[11]L Oneto & S Chiappa (2020) Fairness in machine learning. Recent Trends in Learning from Data: Tutorials from the Informs 2017 Tutorials.

[12]D Pessach & E Shmueli (2022) A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR).

[13]W Chen, Y Klochkov & Y Liu (2023) Post-hoc bias scoring is optimal for fair classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05725.

[14]KM Alhawiti (2014) Natural language processing and its use in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications.

[15]TLM Suryanto, AP Wibawa, et al. (2025) Comparative performance of transformer models for cultural heritage in NLP tasks. Advance in Social Science, Education and Social Research.

[16]R Somers, S Cunningham-Nelson, et al. (2021) Applying natural language processing to automatically assess student conceptual understanding from textual responses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[17]F Zou, L Wang, X Hei, D Chen & B Wang (2013) Multi-objective optimization using teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

[18]W Mao, W Wang & H Sun (2020) Optimization path for overcoming barriers in China’s environmental protection institutional system. Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]A Eguchi, H Okada & Y Muto (2021) Contextualizing AI education for K-12 students to enhance their learning of AI literacy through culturally responsive approaches. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz.

[20]P Fraternali & M Tisi (2008) Identifying cultural markers for web application design targeted to a multi-cultural audience. In 2008 Eighth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[21]D Hovy & S Prabhumoye (2021) Five sources of bias in natural language processing. Language and linguistics compass.

[22]A Kaplan & JK Garner (2017) A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental psychology.

[23]K Allan, J Azcona, S Sripada, et al. (2025) Stereotypical bias amplification and reversal in an experimental model of human interaction with generative artificial intelligence. Royal Society Open Science.

[24]N Elouazizi (2014) Critical factors in data governance for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics.

[25]O Viberg, RF Kizilcec, AF Wise, I Jivet, et al. (2024) Advancing equity and inclusion in educational practices with AI‐powered educational decision support systems (AI‐EDSS). British Journal of Educational Technology.

[26]S Amershi, D Weld, M Vorvoreanu, A Fourney, et al. (2019) Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In 2019 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[27]D Wang, J Chen, H Zhou, X Qiu & L Li (2021) Contrastive aligned joint learning for multilingual summarization. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

[28]P Giangrandi & C Tasso (1997) Managing temporal knowledge in student modeling. In User Modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling.

[29]CC Lin, AYQ Huang & OHT Lu (2023) Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments.

[30]T Hübscher-Younger & NH Narayanan (2003) Constructive and collaborative learning of algorithms. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin.

[31]L Fernsel, Y Kalff & K Simbeck (2025) Audits for Trust: An Auditability Framework for AI-Based Learning Analytics Systems. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.

[32]D Zytko, P J. Wisniewski, S Guha, et al. (2022) Participatory design of AI systems: opportunities and challenges across diverse users, relationships, and application domains. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

Issue

Section

Articles